Why Science is the New Irrational Religion

[vc_row][vc_column][button new_tab=”yes” border_radius=”2″ size=”small” color=”alizarin” title=”Subscribe to my channel” icon=”hb-moon-youtube” link=”http://www.youtube.com/mistermorgueofficial?sub_confirmation=1″ class=”hb-aligncenter”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column 0=””][vc_column_text]

 

People generally think science is all about truth, but as we’ll show in this video, it is nowhere near the truth and it’s “explanations” about your existence and your purpose are just as absurd as a mainstream religion.

Every era thinks that they have it all figured and the ideas of the past were absurd. Those born in the early ages of humanity thought their primitive stories about creation were true. Those born in the Christian era thought that their religious ideas were true, and most of born today think that scientific materialism is true. But in actuality, the people of the future will look back on scientific materialism as a primitive and childish view of reality.

Don’t get trapped by the consciousness of the era that you were born into. In a hundred years science will look nothing like it does today. So if you are really looking for truth, then have an open mind and weigh everything we are about to say with logic and reason.

You see people assume that scientific materialism is rational, however that is blatantly incorrect. Our system, Hyperianism, is mathematical, rationalist, and deductive. While science is about sense data, empiricism and induction. Science is an empirical system which is opposed to rationalism. This cannot be stressed enough, science is not about reason, science privileges empiricism. The definition of empiricism is “the doctrine that all knowledge is derived from sense experience.” Whereas rationalism is the doctrine that all knowledge is based on reason and not on religious faith or sense experience.

These two views are opposites and never forget that science is an empirical system, not a rational system. Furthermore science is inductive whereas our system is deductive. Deduction is a method of reasoning that guarantees 100% that the conclusion is true no matter what.

While induction is a method based on repeated tests that only ever give a probability of something being true, no matter how good the inductive test are it always has the probability of being wrong. Deduction is about guaranteed truth while induction only gives a probability of being true.

For example, Classical mechanics was once thought to be absolutely true and you were considered crazy by the scientific establishment if you thought otherwise. However, today it is known that Classical mechanics is completely and utterly false and it has been replaced by quantum mechanics.

Now understand what we are saying, science has been great at coming up with advances in technology and medicine, that’s wonderful. But just because science comes up with material inventions does not mean that they know the truth about reality, that is a huge logical fallacy. Fallacies are everywhere, for example, if a person prayed to god for a sick person to get better, and they did, it does not mean that it was because of the prayer. And just because science can come up with smart phones and pads does not mean they know anything about the underlying nature of reality.

In fact, Classical mechanics is responsible for all these advances and getting people to the moon, but it is a fact that Classical mechanics is 100% wrong and it has been completely refuted and replaced by quantum mechanics. Even though Classical mechanics is definitely incorrect it can still create the technology to put a man on the moon. Material success does not equal truth. Scientists like to pretend that they are on the side of logic and reason, when the opposite is true, they put their faith in the senses and are just as dogmatic about is a mainstream religious person. Mainstream religion argues their position based on faith while scientific materialism argues their position based on sensory data. Both faith and sense data are opposed to rational and logical method. Max Planck, the famous physicist who was the originator of quantum theory said

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” … “Science progresses one funeral at a time.”

Don’t believe the lie that scientists are on the side of logic and reason, they are on the side of fallible sense data. Sense data once said that classical mechanics was correct even though it is known to be 100% wrong. Bias and stubbornness is just as present in scientific materialism as anywhere else. It is only once they are dead and gone that a new path is cleared for new ideas. This is why science cannot come up with a theory for everything. If they got rid of their fallacious belief system and replaced it with a mathematical system of logic and reason they would have a final theory of everything within 10 years.

Another huge misconception about science is that it has most things about the world figured out and that there are just a few things left to get right. Nothing could be further from the truth! Think about this carefully. Let’s say you just entered this universe for the first time and you are trying to figure out what reality is, so you look at a table and ask “What is a table”, the reply might be well it is made out of wood. But has that really answered your question? Of course not! You would have to know what wood is first or else you are just trading words around. So if you ask what is wood, you get the answer “well wood is a composite of molecules”, But of course you don’t know what molecules are so you ask well what are molecules? Well molecules are composed of atoms, what are atoms? Atoms are composed of electrons proton and neutrons. And what are electrons, protons and neutrons? Well electrons are fundamental particles and the other nucleons are also composed of fundamental particles. Okay… what are fundamental particles? … No idea… That’s right, what fundamental particles actually are, is completely and totally unknown by science. EVERYTHING in reality is composed of fundamental particles yet science has not the faintest clue what they actually are. If you cannot account for what everything in the universe is made out of you can’t account for anything! Science cannot account for fundamental particles and hence has 0 knowledge of what reality, the universe, you or I, matter or anything actually is. It can build technology but when it comes to truth it has completely and utterly failed.

The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics says that reality is collapsed into existence by an unreal, random, probabilistic, wavefunction. That is absurd! And it all stems from scientism’s dogmatic refusal to contemplate a non local, mathematical existence outside of space/time. As soon as you accept a mathematical existence all these absurdities disappear but scientists are just as stubborn and closed minded as those that follow a mainstream religion. By the Copenhagen interpretation science is now founded on indeterminism and randomness, the complete opposite of logic and reason. They have made themselves the enemies of reason.

Reality is NOT based on an unreal probabilistic wavefunction, instead reality is based on pure mathematical frequency, sin and cosine waves generated by the Euler formula, the soul equation, whose interactions give rise to the space/time dimension and what humanity calls physical reality. Physical reality is not based on something unreal and random as scientism absurdly claims, instead it is based on the immaterial singularity composed of living mathematical patterns, sin and cosine waves.

Scientific materials and empiricism must be abolished and replaced with scientific rationalism and idealism. If scientific rationalism was accepted then a revolution of knowledge would occur and all of the problems and gaping contradictions in the current paradigm would be solved. But this would mean they would need to accept a mental and mathematical existence, something they refuse to do and fear because they would have to admit their material beliefs were wrong.
Scientific materialism WILL be replaced by scientific rationalism, it is inevitable, it can take 100 years, or it can take 10, it up to this world, it’s up to you, it’s up to us.

Scientific materialists are incredibly close minded and shuts down any discourse about scientific rationalism and idealism as Max Planck said “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die”

Scientism is not logical as it denies a priori logic. Scientism is not rigoursly mathematical as it mutilates mathematics by denying the reality of complex numbers in order to fit their materialist beliefs. Scientism is not rational, it is empirical and supports disorder and randomness, the exact opposite of rationalism.

Hyperianism reject scientific materialism and supports scientific rationalism. It is a system based on a complete and consistent mathematical reality that supports a mental existence outside of space/time. It guarantees that you are an eternal Mind, a soul, of infinite energy that can never die, governed by the Euler formula, the soul equation.

Arthur Schopenhauer said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
Such is the fate of all great truths.

Do you have the ability to see the truth now? To be able to step outside of the confines of the belief system that you were born into? Break through the outdated and backwards system of materialism and take a step forward with us into the future.

Ad Astra. To the stars.
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]